News Room







June 16, 2009

On June 15th the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a 5-1 opinion, held that the Sheetz, Altoona, restaurant/convenience store/gas station is not entitled to a retail dispenser license to sell beer. This decision upholds the Commonwealth Court decision issued in February, 2007. Sheetz, in the hearing on its license before the PLCB, had made clear that it would not sell beer for on-premises consumption but only for take-out. Commonwealth Court and now the Supreme Court have both held that take-out only policy is illegal under the Liquor Code. The Court agreed with MBDA's arguments that:

(a) Allowing a retail dispenser to sell for take-out purposes only "affords [Sheetz] the benefits of a distributor license without imposing the accompanying restrictions" and allows it to "act as a distributor...yet not be burdened with the restriction of selling by the case."

(b) Allowing Sheetz to operate in that fashion would "infringe upon the market niche legislatively carved for the distributor" and would "expand the character of retail dispenser outlets to encompass commecial entities, unlike hotels, restaurants, clubs and eating places, which do not currently engage in the sale of alcohol."

(c) Any such expansion as mentioned in (b) is a policy determination for the legislature.

(d) The PLCB used a "loophole" to issue a license to Sheetz.

(e) Using such a loophole "far more commercial facilities, which were never clearly contemplated by the Legislature to sell beer through any provision of the [Liquor] Code, could be licensed to sell six-packs."

(f) The PLCB's interpretation of a retail dispenser "is contrary to the clear legislative scheme regarding beer distribution."

We await comment from the PLCB as to the effect this decision will have on other pending license protests MBDA has filed against Wegmans, Weis, Giant Eagle, Whole Foods and others. It should be noted that the law firm representing Sheetz is the same firm representing Wegmans and virtually every other supermarket in their quests for licenses to sell beer from what they call their "restaurants" but what are in truth no more than tthe beer aisle of their supermarkets.

MBDA is optimistic that this decision is a predictor of good news on the Wegmans and other supermarket cases, but we will need to be patient and await Supreme Court action on those cases. We thank each and every contributor to the Legal Defense Fund. Without your support this result could never have been achieved.

May, 2017
March, 2017
December, 2016
November, 2016
October, 2016
September, 2016
July, 2016
May, 2016
February, 2016
December, 2015
July, 2015
June, 2015
May, 2015
March, 2015
February, 2015
July, 2014
April, 2014
September, 2013
May, 2013
April, 2013
February, 2013
October, 2012
July, 2012
June, 2012
April, 2012
January, 2012
July, 2011
June, 2011
May, 2011
December, 2010
November, 2010
August, 2010
April, 2010
February, 2010
December, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
July, 2009
June, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
February, 2009
December, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
July, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
October, 2007